terajk: Death the Kid on Black Star's shoulders, holding an umbrella. Black Star is looking up at something. (death star)
[personal profile] terajk
This started as a comment on [personal profile] sholio's post about part 3 of The Promise. (spoilers). It ended up...this.


Avatar: The Last Airbender has several disabled characters, and I love them all. It handles some tropes about disability with more depth and nuance than I'm used to seeing in Western media. Still, it's not perfect--nothing is--and its treatment of Princess Azula's psychotic episode in the finale brought a lot of problems to the forefront for me.

I chose this very non-AtLA icon deliberately. Soul Eater's Black*Star and Death the Kid are two disabled characters who interact quite a lot; their relationship develops over time and they kick ass together and interact with the other disabled characters in the cast. In contrast, while in AtLA there are three characters with disabilities for most of the story, they don't interact with each other much. Teo never meets Toph or Zuko, and Toph is the only member of Team Avatar not to get a character- and relationship-developing field trip with Zuko. Arguably, the most meaningful interaction two disabled people have is Zuko and Azula's Agni Kai. (Black*Star and Kid had a Huge, Meaningful Fight too, but they had a lot of interaction before and after.) In Revamping the Bechdel Test for Disability, Renee Martin wonders what a Bechdel-type test for disabled characters would look like ("Two disabled characters who talk to each other...") Whle AtLA technically passes (Toph and Zuko have conversations that aren't meant to inspire non-disabled people), I wish it passed better, considering how major Toph and Zuko are.

But, like anyone else in the cast, individually, Toph and Zuko are well-rounded characters with strengths and flaws, and they change over the course of the story. (Azula is, too--I'd say she's more interesting and well-rounded than her father, who is supposed to be the Number 1 Villain.) Toph is blind. She can also fight, invent new kinds of bending, be an obnoxious jerk ("Three on three, plus Sokka"), as well as need to learn how to look out for a group of people rather than just herself. I love her and Katara's friendship, and how it challenges them both. In Katara's culture, people work together to stay alive; Toph's only idea of "help" is her parents' toxic belief that she can't do anything for herself. (In a sense, Toph doesn't want to help her new friends like Katara is asking in "The Chase" partly because they are her friends. Why would she treat people she likes like her parents treat her?)

Yes, Toph has Disability Superpowers, but these superpowers don't negate her disability entirely. There are some surfaces, like ice, water and sand, that she can't use earthbending to navigate; also, she can't read or write, as her culture has only a visual writing system. Also, characters tend to forget she's blind--and she sets them straight, snarkily. (Like "I don't see skin color!" "I forget you're disabled!" is really problematic and not the sign of utopia people think it is.) Toph's difficulty with "help" shows the harm that the Disability Superpower trope does--it says that, to be valuable, disabled people must have a special talent that benefits non-disabled people somehow, no matter what the cost. These are all fabulous things.

But.

Toph isn't just someone whose disability is part of her. She also teaches a Very Special Lesson about disability to the audience--namely, that disabled people can Do Things--in a way that, while much less didactic than usual, still takes me out of the story. When we first see a blind little-girl wrestler, Katara asks, "She can't really be blind...can she?" Frankly, I'm surprised that Katara would ask this. Her culture depends on people working together to survive. There's also a huge war going on--I'd think that disabled war veterans would still be part of her community, Doing Things in any way they could. To be honest, after 100 years of war I'd expect to see a lot more disabled characters than just three. It reminds me of [personal profile] ambyr's analysis of gender (im)balance in AtLA.

As for Zuko, the writers are certainly playing with the trope that evil characters have scars. His reasons for doing what he's doing are complicated, and he redeems himself after a long, long time. But, again, his scar isn't just there; it marks him and Means Something in terms of his character development. Because of this he eventually decides he doesn't want it cured, and also thanks his father for the lessons his scarring and banishment taught him. As Zuko gets more complicated and sympathetic, his hair grows out, covering more and more of the scar. Also, TVTropes points out that Zuko's narrow left eye (small eyes being associated with villainous characters) and his unscarred right one are a visual representation of his moral ambivalence.

So, while there are important disabled characters with depth and flaws and character development, disability in AtLA cannot just exist: it must Mean Something for the audience.

And then we get to Princess Azula; the way the show handles her psychotic break brings all these little problems to the surface for me, magnifies them, and contradicts stuff it had said about disability earlier.

I don't think Azula's psychotic break is a slapdash way for the writers to avoid killing her, as some fans have argued. For one thing, the word "crazy" is used in two specific ways throughout the series, even before Azula appears. It denotes things that are easily dismissed or silly (King Bumi is called "crazy" until Team Avatar decides they like him; then Aang calls him a "mad genius"; Sokka's disparagement of fortune-telling; "You're all gonna think I'm crazy, but there's a metal man coming"; "This is crazy! How can we beat someone who blows things up with his mind?"). It's also used to refer to Azula specifically ("Girls are crazy!"--when the only girl who did the thing Zuko was mad about was Azula; Katara referring to "...crazy blue firebending"; "She's crazy and she needs to go down").

Even Azula's terrible understanding of people--so terrible that she doesn't have the "glib, superficial charm" proper sociopaths are supposed to have--which leads to her psychotic episode only becomes obvious during "The Beach," but is evident in Season 2. She sneers at Long Feng for being a better sociopath than she is crawling up to power from the bottom (which probably involved getting people to trust him), rather than having it by divine right. But she doesn't have power by "right," either. She has it because her father gave it to her. (Your awesome ship and Zuko's crappy one didn't materialize out of nowhere, Princess.) And even Ozai's thing about Azula being born lucky and Zuko lucky to be born back in Season 1 is evidence that he's manipulating both his children.

I also think that Mai saw Azula's weakness in dealing with people from the beginning. When she refuses to go into the slurry and "I don't care how much lightning Azula slings at me," she knows that scaring people and exerting power over them is all Azula can do--not to mention, Azula wasn't controlling Mai as well as she thought, even then. "You miscalculated. I love Zuko more than I fear you"--"I have more power over me than you ever did"--is constructed so that Azula will understand it. (I also think that Azula is operating from a different definition of "love" than analyses of her character are using--something like, "Love is a power I can control people with?? Zuko has this awesome power to control Mai that I don't???"And then she tries to use the power of love by kiling Katara and destroying Zuko in the process, but Zuko and Katara can use the Power of Love better than her so it backfires, multiplies and kicks her ass.)

Not only is psychosis associated with a really awful person (again), but Azula's disability has a function in the plot: to make her easier for Zuko and Katara to beat in a fight. Now, I love that for all Zuko's growth he is *not* capable of winning against Azula himself, but disability as "Thank you, the Universe!" is just...no. (What happened to Disabled People Can Do Things?) It also represents how, as Zuko has matured and gotten stronger, Azula's fallen. The last shot of her dad? Zuko visiting him in prison. (Dude's not a threat anymore partly because he's behind bars for life.) The last shot of Azula? Chained to a grate. I'm sure it was supposed to show that not all endings are neat and tidy, especially when Zuko has all these complicated feelings about her, but it comes off like psychosis neutralizes her in itself. (Again, what happened to Disabled People Can Do Things?) And psychosis doesn't even have to be chronic.

Man, I wrote a lot of words about this. I'd better stop now.

Date: 2012-11-05 07:15 am (UTC)
From: [personal profile] chordatesrock
Oh, by the way, I wish to make this tl;dr monster of a comment even longer. I just noticed this in my Google Docs that I'd started writing before reading this post, and abandoned at some point. I'm posting it here, typos and all (because I no longer know whether I meant "portrayed" or "portrayal" or something else entirely; I forgot this existed):

Teo and Toph make a good contrast with each other because of two very different approaches to disability portray. Teo’s disability (and it’s probably not paraplegia) just is, and doesn’t matter. Definitely one way to do it. But that doesn’t mean that portraying ableism is ableist. Toph’s family is ableist, and it’s portrayed. Unthinking assumptions on the main characters’ parts are portrayed (initial disbelief that Toph is really blind if she’s a fighter), but it is NOT a “characters learn a lesson” story; the conflict is NOT about getting the leads to realize that disability doesn’t prevent someone from being awesome. There is conflict caused by Toph’s parents’ failure to realize that, but it isn’t resolved with their learning a lesson.

The narrative doesn’t care. The characters care in one case and don’t in another, but the narrative doesn’t intrude. The portrayal is-- well, Toph can see with her feet and Teo can fly, I’m not sure “realistic” is actually the word I’m looking for. It doesn’t break my suspension of disbelief, it isn’t othering, it doesn’t put the characters on a pedestal and it doesn’t portray ridiculous cliches. (Though blind people with magical navigation is getting kind of cliche. It’s not quite there yet, and anyway, in this case it seems reasonable.) And given that they have their magic, how they live with it and their disabilities doesn’t seem too ridiculous.

The kid at the Southern Air Temple, on the other hand, is pretty faily. He looks stereotypically intellectually developmentally disabled, which may just be an appearance. That’s used to cue you to the fact that he’s not a valuable team member for whatever game the children excluded Aang from. And yes, I actually am talking about that kid seen in one scene in flashback. I think he has a name. I don’t remember it.

“She’s crazy and she needs to go down.” Crazy is not a good reason to give up on trying to get along with someone. How about “she’s evil and has been this way by nature and not by circumstance”? That would be more to the point, if not so snappy.

October 2016

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324 2526272829
3031     

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 24th, 2026 02:52 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios