terajk: Ryoga, grabbing Ranma by his pajama-top and shouting: "Do you remember where my house is?!" (Default)
[personal profile] terajk
Because I am the luckiest person EVER, I've been chatting with the fabulous and sparkly [personal profile] esmenet about gender in Rumiko Takahashi's manga Ranma 1/2. It made me remember this godawful analysis of gender in Ranma 1/2 I read a while back (Akira and Ranma 1/2: The Monstrous Adolescent by Susan Jollife Napier, available as part of a Google Books preview for USAians). While arguing that in Ranma 1/2 "boundaries are reinscribed into the conventions of a heterosexual hierarchical society" with a straight face (ahahahaha), she said this. (Out of spite, I fixed a sentence. My correction is in bold and CAPSLOCK):

Ryoga, one of Ranma's competitors transforms into an adorable miniature pig, unhappily at first, but he becomes increasingly philosophical about it as he realizes this allows him to sleep with Akane. It is clear therefore that male is the norm, and it is the female that is one of a variety of attributes (including panda-ness, pig-ness, [DISABILITY],) that signify difference. Furthermore, being female is coded as being inferior to being a pig or a panda.


But is female coded as being inferior to being disabled? In a way that is obvious to everyone in the entire cast? Hint: No. Takahashi doesn't treat one as worse than the other, and everyone's response to Ranma's being a girl sometimes and Ryoga's amazing lostness is basically a flash of "OH MY GAWD" "Wha?" followed by "Eh, that happens."

Also, [personal profile] esmenet and I have been discussing this male norm that Ryoga upholds. It involves protecting women from that guy you're obsessed with men who would sully their honor by day and sleeping with them without their consent at night (That guy you're obsessed with calls you on your skeevy bullshit. Regularly); fantasizing about living with them in a cave full of monsters that terrify them because that way they will be physically unable to leave you; trying to murder the hypoteneuse to get him out of the way (the hypoteneuse is too easygoing to even think of killing you), and using your sudden and inexplicable Neurotypicality Bonus--it's over 9,000!--to stalk them. (In the author's defense, THAT example of the norm only happens in the manga. And yes, that Neurotypicality Bonus vanishes into thin air afterwards, never to be seen again. Which I guess is Ryoga upholding a norm. Or the status quo, at least.)

Ranma's curse isn't "inferior" to anyone else's: everyone except Kuno knows that Ranma is a girl sometimes in the same way they except Akane know that Ryoga is a pig or that Ranma's dad is a panda, and no real fucks are given. Ranma is as ambivalent about their curse as Ryoga is (all the cursed characters' feelings are complicated), because even though Ranma will insist "I am a guy!" they'll don the girl form at any opportunity--to flirt with Kuno to get something they want, to mess with Ryoga, (Ranma pretends to be Ryoga's fiance in the anime), to get free food.

Also, Ryoga *still* hates his pig curse even knowing that he gets Akane's attention that way, partly because he can ONLY get her attention that way, partly because he's a miserable person in general and partly because turning into a small, tasty pig kind of sucks when a significant part of your disability (ahem) which strangers are shocked by (*ahem*) and EVERYONE is aware of (ahem) but pretty much accepts (AHEM) involves regularly wandering lost in the woods for a week.

Check out this shining example of the NORM OF MALENESS. The "male norm" thing does seem to happen at first but it gets...complicated* at the very least:



(He ends up back at this village twice more, still looking for Furinkan High School; someone says he could be a tourist attraction. Nope--no monstrous adolescent bodies here.)

In the manga, this shining example of masculine superiority intends to ask a girl he's (thinking he's) dating to walk him to his own house. I don't hear of too many girls walking dudes home on stereotypical het dates. (FTR, I'm female and have Ryoga's impairment, which he is a scarily accurate portrayal of; strangers are ALWAYS offering to take me home.)

TL;DR: [personal profile] esmenet's analysis of gender in Ranma 1/2 is WAY BETTER.

*And by "complicated" I don't mean "emasculating." Ryoga is very strong and capable--and Ranma's first serious threat--but he doesn't quite fit the very strict box of Shining Maleness that exists IN HIS OWN HEAD. IOW, Ryoga's the one with strict ideas about masculinity--not the series. He is always telling Ranma to do things "like a man" and, in cases where Ryoga's gotten so lost he couldn't find Ranma for a fight (once in the middle of the fight they were having), he accuses RANMA of "running away" or being a "coward" and gets angry/defensive when Ranma tries to defend themself with the facts. ("You wandered off and got lost! "Don't patronize me!")

Date: 2012-07-12 10:44 am (UTC)
nenena: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nenena
Everything that Susan Napier has ever written about anime is stupid. AMAZINGLY stupid. She's like a textbook example of how NOT to write about another culture's media from an outsider's perspective. (In fact, one of my Japanese professors in college used her first book about anime for exactly that purpose - to demonstrate what DOIN IT WRONG looks like.)

Date: 2012-07-12 03:00 pm (UTC)
nenena: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nenena
I think my *~favorite~* thing that Napier ever wrote was her analysis of how Ah! My Goddess (and somehow by extension all "magical girlfriend" anime) was totally super-feminist because the non-powered male protagonist totally didn't mind dating a girlfriend who was more powerful than him.

Like, did we not notice how Belldandy's powers were entirely devoted to being subservient to Keiichi and making his life awesome and/or protecting him from harm. Or how it's a common male fantasy that you can be a total loser with no awesome skills and still have an amazingly powerful woman fall completely in love with you. And I'm saying this as somebody who shamelessly LOVES Ah! My Goddess. But it takes a very special type of stupid to not notice the story and characters are totally male wish-fulfillment fantasies.

I could probably rant more about Napier but I feel like I'm hijacking the topic of this post already. I think back in the day she also wrote some absolutely off-the-wall crazy stuff about magical girls (like, her examples of the 'magical girl' genre were Sailor Moon and Bubblegum Crisis wait WRONG GENRE HON) but she was also among the first Western academics to write about anime and get published in Serious Academic Publications so a lot of people just sort of took her word for stuff that they shouldn't have taken her word on.

Date: 2012-07-12 09:31 pm (UTC)
nenena: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nenena
I think that what irks me the most about Napier is that she just plain fell right into the Number One Mistake that scholars about media from outside their culture do, and that is that she made sweeping conclusions about all Japanese media based on a very few examples that she had been exposed to. And the fact that she hadn't been exposed to much shows through in her writing - I mean, she thought that Bubblegum Crisis was a magical girl anime because IF THE CHARACTERS TRANSFORM THEN THEY'RE MAGICAL GIRLS, RIGHT?! - and it's just, argh.

Speaking of Perfect Blue and terrible anime criticism! Every year when my first-year Japanese students watch Princess Mononoke I make it a tradition to share with them this amazing set of idiotic quotes from Actual Serious Respected Movie Reviewers about the Pokemon the Movie/Perfect Blue/Princess Mononoke trifecta that suddenly burst into mainstream US theaters in 1998/1999ish:

http://www.megami-sama.net/files/ljpics04/criticalmassjpg_01.jpg

http://www.megami-sama.net/files/ljpics04/criticalmassjpg_02.jpg

(copy and paste the URLs)

At the time anime was like this brand-new thing to mainstream audiences and nobody really knew what to make of films like Perfect Blue and Princess Mononoke. I remember that Mononoke being released in theaters was such a big deal that major news outlets like Dateline and 60 Minutes were doing features about it. But again, none of the reporters or critics had really experienced non-kiddie anime before, so a lot of them did the same thing Napier did and rushed to show how ~deeply~ they understood this ~unique and exotic~ stuff from Japan by, you know, overgeneralizing and exoticizing it. Napier did that in the academic arena but a lot of non-academics were doing it in the journalism world too.

I mean, none of the above will ever quite reach the depths of stupidity of academics like John Wittier Treat (who famously analyzed Banana Yoshimoto's Kitchen as a novella about pure, non-sexual love while COMPLETELY MISSING that the story was all about the heroine's sexual frustration because the object of her lust was OBLIVIOUS to how she felt about him, thus proving himself as HILARIOUSLY CLUELESS as the love interest in the story - oh and he also said that shoujo comics were all about representing non-sexual love while basing his entire analysis on Sailor Moon and somehow totally missing the fact that Usagi actually DID have sex with Mamoru, you know, on page and everything). But it's still hilarious to revisit nonetheless.
Edited (Oops, borked the links!) Date: 2012-07-12 09:33 pm (UTC)

Date: 2012-07-12 11:44 pm (UTC)
nenena: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nenena
True story: I was one of those kids who rented "Legend of the Overfiend" from Blockbuster because they put it in the kids' section and I didn't know what it was.

And I brought it to a sleepover.

One of the most embarrassing moments of my life.

Date: 2012-07-13 05:05 am (UTC)
esmenet: Azula raising her eyebrow and giving a sidelong look (*raised eyebrow*)
From: [personal profile] esmenet
I remember she wrote some stuff about Miyazaki and Sailor Moon that was TOTALLY OFF BASE—I think she called SM unfeminist or something?—and then I totally scribbled all over the photocopy my film teacher gave me, going on and on about NO THIS IS WRONG and also wtf are you doing those are totally different genres you need some more background there to not look like you are just pulling it out of your ass. LET ME TELL YOU ABOUT MAGICAL GIRL HISTORY, SUSAN NAPIER. LET ME LINK YOU TO THESE VIDEOS OF MAGICAL GIRL OPENINGS FROM 1966 ONWARDS ON YOUTUBE.

(bwahaha how do you interpret shoujo manga as NON-SEXUAL love, quite a lot of shoujo manga is just thinly veiled porn or porn lead-up (*cough* Vampire Knight *cough* Black Bird *cough*) and I should know)

Date: 2012-07-13 05:11 am (UTC)
esmenet: Aki Natsuko from Re: Cutie Honey, looking stern (*glasses check*)
From: [personal profile] esmenet
I wish my film teacher last semester had been experienced enough to do that! Sadly, he gave us like three handouts from her, most of which I didn't read because I knew I probably knew more about anime at that point than was actually printed in English-language books. Always fun, that.

Date: 2012-07-13 10:04 pm (UTC)
nenena: (Default)
From: [personal profile] nenena
Wow. I didn't know that Napier was still respected in film studies circles or read in classes. That's disappointing.

Date: 2012-07-13 05:06 am (UTC)
esmenet: Aang saying "Why yes, I AM made of awesome." (why yes i am made of awesome)
From: [personal profile] esmenet
THERE ARE NO BETTER ADJECTIVES TO APPLY TO MY NAME. And aaah, I forgot about the time he was going to ask Akane to walk him home! I do remember that the first indication of Ryoga and Ranma being actual friends instead of friendly-ish rivals was when Ranma said they'd walked him home about three hundred times. YOUR RYOUGA ANALYSIS IS SO MUCH BETTER THAN MY RYOUGA ANALYSIS.

October 2016

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
2324 2526272829
3031     

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 30th, 2025 07:03 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios